Cascadia Surgical — S&OP / Demand Review
Cascadia Surgical and its planning cycles are fictional and every number on this page is simulated; scored against the plan locked at cycle sign-off. It is a purpose-built synthetic set of plan snapshots with planted measurement traps to find.
What to look for
- A family whose attainment reads nearly nineteen points better against the estimate it kept editing than against the plan it actually signed
- A family that re-cuts its plan every cycle — four times the portfolio’s churn — while its attainment looks perfectly ordinary
- A site where supply never committed to a fifth of the locked plan, on families whose demand attainment reads above goal
- Two families missing in opposite directions, where the uncapped number says the plan was met and the capped one says neither family made it
- A franchise ranking that reverses depending on whether you pool the numbers or average the families’ own rates
- Ten points of attainment that appear or vanish purely with how far ahead the plan was cut
attainment 88.2% (capped) · cycle 2025-09
- Consensus plan, one line per locked cycle (15)
- Actual demand, through 2026-06
Fifteen locked planning cycles, each drawn as the consensus plan it committed to for its next nine months, cascading across one shared calendar, with actual demand beneath them through June 2026. Every cycle re-plans months an earlier cycle already planned, so where the curves part, the room changed its mind. Attainment scores one of those plans against the actual, and the demo's argument is that no published source tells you how to compute it.
plan.json · 15 cycles × 9 plan months · 23 months, actual through 2026-06
Snapshot frozen 2026-06