Cascadia Surgical — S&OP / Demand Review

Simulated data

Cascadia Surgical and its planning cycles are fictional and every number on this page is simulated; scored against the plan locked at cycle sign-off. It is a purpose-built synthetic set of plan snapshots with planted measurement traps to find.

What to look for

A family whose attainment reads nearly nineteen points better against the estimate it kept editing than against the plan it actually signed
A family that re-cuts its plan every cycle — four times the portfolio’s churn — while its attainment looks perfectly ordinary
A site where supply never committed to a fifth of the locked plan, on families whose demand attainment reads above goal
Two families missing in opposite directions, where the uncapped number says the plan was met and the capped one says neither family made it
A franchise ranking that reverses depending on whether you pool the numbers or average the families’ own rates
Ten points of attainment that appear or vanish purely with how far ahead the plan was cut