Cascadia Surgical — Supplier Scorecard

Simulated data

Cascadia Surgical and its suppliers are fictional and every number on this page is simulated; delivery measured on the dock date. It is a purpose-built synthetic purchase-order book with planted measurement traps to find.

What to look for

A high-volume supplier disruption that pulls portfolio OTD below goal, then recovers month by month
One large supplier whose delivery deficit is real — it clears the 99.8% control limits at its volume
Small vendors whose rates wander five points and more on sampling luck alone, and are never flagged
A supplier whose on-time rate jumps twelve points the moment reschedules are allowed to count
The most punctual big supplier — with the worst inspection-reject rate in the book
A category whose purchase prices drift upward all year while the annual variance reads as one calm number

OTD 92.5% vs original promise · 14,965 PO lines

On time against the original promise
On time against the current, re-cut promise

Each row is one supplier: on-time delivery against the date it first promised, beside on-time delivery against the date it promises now. The six widest gaps among the 22 suppliers are drawn, and the distance between the two dots is reliability that exists only because the promise was re-cut — which is why the house figure is scored against the original date.

facts.json · 22 suppliers · ranked by re-promise gap, top 6 drawn

Snapshot frozen 2026-07

The reference build portfolio

Every build runs over its own frozen, simulated snapshot and keeps its own scope controls, so these links open an instrument rather than carrying this one’s selection into it.